Review of Spider-Man: Far From Home

So I’ve got something of a love-hate relationship with Spider-Man. For a long time, I would have considered him my favorite superhero. However, he just didn’t age as well as some of the other superheroes, especially in a post-Dark Knight and Iron Man universe, and the result was that for a while I just stopped following him.

That’s not strictly true; I watched The Amazing Spider-Man and was fairly disappointed (barring the action, which was okay), and I was basically put off enough that I never watched the Tom Holland versions.

Then I eventually caved and watched Into the Spider-Verse, which was absolutely amazing, and I started reconsidering my approach to Spider-Man. Then I got a discount on a movie ticket, and figured I may as well use it to see Spider-Man: Far From Home.

Personally, I had found Tom Holland a little annoying in the MCU. Because of that I hadn’t seen Spider-Man: Homecoming, and I only saw Into the Spider-Verse because I was hounded to by friends and reviewers (they were correct; it was awesome!).

So I went to the theater, not yet having watched Homecoming. I’ve watched it since, because Far From Home is just so awesome, but I was really going in blind.

Which lets me say that Far From Home doesn’t require a whole lot of recent Spider-Man experience. It helps to know the basic concepts and who the main characters are, but it’s a great film and really delivers on a lot of fronts.

All-in-all, I found it to be one of the best action/superhero movies of the year. There were a few spots where it wasn’t perfect, but the merits were strong enough that only a wholehearted critic wouldn’t have enjoyed the film.

I got to watch on a massive screen (not the largest out there, but more than the average movie theater), and it was really a great experience.

The CGI is fantastic, but it doesn’t overshadow the characters. It feels much more like a MCU movie than Homecoming does, and Homecoming is much better than the earlier Sony affairs that I watched. The choreography of the fights is tremendous. It all comes together in a fantastic way, and the post-credits scenes tease things that I’m really looking forward to.

The plot is deep and well-developed, with Peter Parker’s internal conflict being as much a driving force as external events. Set after Avengers: Endgame, Far From Home deals with the threats that almost nobody has the tools to take care of.

There’s a lot of talk about Spider-Man taking over for Iron Man as head of the Avengers/Stark Industries, and I feel like Tom Holland’s performance could be sufficient to help him carry the franchise forward if that’s the role Spider-Man winds up taking in the MCU.

Really, all the acting is great. Every major character gets enough screen time and development to really have a reason to be there, and the minor characters serve their roles without getting in the way.

Far From Home is executed almost flawlessly, and shows that the MCU doesn’t need to end with Endgame. It’s the sort of high-quality fare that one would hope to see more of in the future: elevated superhero stories that focus on people and conflicts with inspirational meaning, but still give a great spectacle.

Review of Avengers: Endgame

I went and saw Avengers: Endgame today, and I was not disappointed. I will keep this review as spoiler-free as possible, so feel free to enjoy.

I was somewhat on the fence about Endgame. I enjoyed Captain Marvel, but I was worried about some of the choreography (I felt Captain Marvel suffered from over-long fights) and the impact of a new character introduced so recently in the MCU on a story which is predominantly about the characters we’ve been following for years now.

Continue reading “Review of Avengers: Endgame”

Review and Reflection: Captain Marvel

I put off seeing Captain Marvel for a while because it seems to be my norm over the past week to procrastinate, but I’ve also been a little less excited to see it because I saw a good mix of positive and negative reviews from critics I liked: I wanted to see it, but I wasn’t willing to put up with a crowded theater to see it.

So I finally went today (actually a couple days before the publication, but at the time of writing it’s only been a couple hours since I actually saw the movie), and I was actually really pleasantly surprised.


I’d say that Captain Marvel is a 9/10 movie buried in a 7/10 movie. I normally don’t use numbers, but I think it’s a good illustrative point here.

I actually thought all the acting was really good; I’d heard complaints about stiffness, and there were a couple points in dialogue where things wore thin, but also a lot of moments that were really poignant, humorous, or exciting, so I can’t critique the writing too much overall.

Pacing is definitely an issue. I feel like there’s some sort of Marvel convention that says “Thou shalt have movies be more than two hours long” that drove some of the writing decisions. Upon looking it up, this is not true, but for some reason perfectly correlates with the MCU movies I’ve seen in theaters, as opposed to the ones I’ve seen at home (e.g. Thor).

With that said, there’s a lot of somewhat drawn out exposition and even fight scenes, which is odd because for most of the film the pacing feels really solid. Some early scenes feel over-long, namely the first fight between Captain Marvel (or, as she is known at that point, Vers) and the Skrull.

The movie starts with an amnesia plot; Vers doesn’t remember her prior life as Carol Danvers, and eventually figures out who she is over the course of the film (by about the two-thirds mark she remembers who she really is, courtesy of help from old friends; I’m guesstimating because I wasn’t timing the movie).

The big problem here is that we figure out who she is before she is, and the trailers make it clear too. For some reason, either we’re given a larger glimpse into the character’s mind than they themselves have (which, admittedly, is not impossible), or she’s remarkably stubborn about figuring out who she is despite knowing that she can’t remember anything and then suddenly getting memories or flashbacks.

There is a very small attempt to squelch this when another character mentions that she could have had memories implanted (when she has flashbacks that override the amnesia), but the counterpart to this is that the people who would have implanted the memories seem very keen to find out what they are and also act on information they acquired from those memories.

Or, to put it more simply: It’s the one “idiot ball” moment in the film where a character doesn’t realize everything the audience knows and doesn’t have a good reason to do so, and it’s the main character doing it right in the middle of the main plot. Just a tad frustrating, and one of the reasons why I describe Captain Marvel as a 9/10 movie buried in a 7/10 movie: if the audience were kept in the dark, or Carol Danvers had been quicker to re-emerge, it would’ve been great (or at least good). As it stood, it was just a little bit underwhelming in execution, and amnesia plots are overused as a secondary device, much less a primary one.

Ironically, I think it’s probably the final fight scenes that go on too long despite the clear intent to make them epic and flashy. The triumphant battles go beyond what they need to do to show us the power levels of the characters and make a good narrative point, and as much as the eye-candy is up to Marvel’s traditional quality (albeit, a little flashy even by their standards, something I’ll permit because Captain Marvel typically uses powers that manifest as pure light and energy).

A lot of people have argued that it doesn’t feel like Carol Danvers has a personal stake, but I didn’t get that at all. Except in the fight scenes. They drag on and nobody ever seems to really be impacted unless they’re a faceless extra, and even the lesser henchmen take a giant beating and just keep going. It feels like they had a giant CGI budget to use and insisted on using it all, but it just comes across as spectacle. I think if I watch Captain Marvel again, I might actually skip parts of these scenes; they’re well choreographed, but do nothing to actually move the story forward.

I’m not a huge MCU superfan (though I would describe myself as a lesser fan; I’ve liked them all), but I’d rate Captain Marvel in with the others. I don’t think it’s up to the same level as Infinity Wars was, but it’s definitely at the same level of quality as most of the other character origin films.

One thing that did surprise me a little was the fact that the movie was definitely a little crasser than it had to be. I get that they wanted to play up Carol Danvers (both pre-Kree and post-Kree) as someone who would overcome any obstacle, but there were some unnecessary, somewhat crude remarks by male characters that felt forced (particularly a line about “You know why they call it a cockpit?”) and weren’t even as effective at conveying the sexism she faced as some other events that cropped up (scenes where she is told that she’ll never fly as a pilot and where her father is giving her guff do the same without resorting to crudity). I know that Marvel’s moving toward embracing a PG-13 rating, but combining this with some of the other cussing in the film would have put me off of seeing it with young children in tow. I think it could have been as poignant with a little less explicit language and a little more illustration (and, given some of the things that we see fragments of later in the film, I think they may have actually cut out some of those scenes in favor of the more crude ones, which seems a tragedy).

Generally, despite this, I liked it. Other than feeling that it was a little over-long, I thought it was definitely worth watching. If I were the director, I would’ve trimmed it down a little (or added more context to justify the length of certain scenes), but there were a lot of really good moments and I was into it. Samuel L. Jackson was fantastic, Brie Larson did a tremendous job (there were a couple rough spots, but I put them down to the writers), and it was certainly worthy of the Marvel brand.


Heads-up: I’ve avoided spoiling as much as possible in my review, but my reflections don’t do that so much.

The strongest points in the film come when we see a heroic struggle; this isn’t surprising, since it’s a point that I seize on all the time, but it’s still one that is quite interesting.

Carol Danvers has a two-fold struggle: the internal struggle of mastering herself and coming to grips with her identity, and the external struggle of figuring out what to do with her life and taking the fight to the Kree, who turn out to be the villains.

That’s quite an interesting side to the story, even if it’s not fully executed.

There’s a moment in the ending of the film where Danvers is being interrogated (for lack of a better term) by the Supreme Intelligence, the Kree AI overlord, and she is thrown into her own stream of memories, watching herself fail over and over again.

Her victory comes when she returns to those memories, watching the next bit: the part when she gets back up after failing.

It’s quite a powerful moment, and perhaps the best in the film, because it sums up what makes Danvers different from the Kree: being willing to get up and keep going, always improving herself, rather than sticking with the situation she’s in. By contrast, the Kree are more involved in their own lives, not wanting to change or grow and suppressing anything that might challenge their assumptions of superiority.

Wrapping Up

Captain Marvel was a good movie, and I’m glad I went to see it. It’s not the best movie I’ve ever seen, nor the best in the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but it certainly is worth seeing if you’re at all interested.

Thoughts on Setting Design

I get a lot of comments about how people like settings I’ve created. That’s not bragging, because I’m 95% sure that at least a few of those are sort of forced (yeah, the artist I hired to draw stuff will totally admit that they think my premise is garbage), but it’s happened often enough and reliably enough now that I think I’ve found a few good rules for how to do it, so I’m going to pretend I’m an authority and sketch out some details here.

First, you need passion.

You. Need. Passion.

Not necessarily passion about the setting itself. Some of the stuff I’ve done that people really liked hasn’t been a labor of love for me so much as a testament to my stubborn nature. Rather, you need to have a world in which passion is possible. When I took a class on writing science fiction, I read a rather long (and not terribly wonderful, though I was younger and snarkier so I may not have fully appreciated it) story set in a dystopian future.

Honestly, by half-way through, I was hoping that everyone would die, because there was no passion in the world.

You don’t need some big overarching war or action-packed scene, just something to treasure, something to hope for, something to die for, something to fear. I like to create pantheons for my fantasy settings, because it gives a great way to set the tone and the pace for the setting.

I’ve never seen a character that’s been more interesting than one who is trying to live by a moral code. I think that’s one of the great successes of the Netflix Marvel series (namely Daredevil and Jessica Jones), because they’re about protagonists who need to make a decision about who they are. In our world that’s fairly easy to do, but having codes of religion and codes of law for a setting can really define it.

It’s not enough to just have a code, however. People need to live by it, care about it, have some reason to protect it. They need loved ones and freedom and good society.

That’s what can make bad settings so compelling. White Wolf’s World of Darkness is basically “What if there were a version of our world where all the bad things came true.”

Despite this, some of the best characters in roleplaying and some of the greatest storytelling experiences rise out of the darkness because the people inhabiting this nasty, worn-out world have lovers and children and parents that they want to protect. Their passion is fighting the darkness within and without.

To bring us back to a second point, you need icons in your setting.

Icons let you define the scope.

I think there’s a reason why a lot of really good science-fiction and fantasy franchises focus on central organizations; Star Wars has the Light Side and the Dark Side, Marvel has the Avengers, and The Expanse has the Belt. These are institutions that define the setting, the people and places that we want to look at.

That’s not to say that these stories have to be exclusively monolithic. Star Wars has a massive expanded universe (much of which is now relegated to semi-official status) that contains all sorts of variations on the theme, not all of the Marvel universe’s characters are going to be Avengers, and The Expanse has whole novels that focus very little on the Belt.

However, when you think about what you talk about when you go to talk about these stories, there are clear points for starting conversation. There are entities in the setting that make a good starting point for thinking about it, which makes it entrancing and appealing (and lets you sell a lot of copies of merchandise and books/movies/shows).

When I think of icons, I often think of Stargate. I was too young to really watch it on TV when it came out, but I considered myself something of a fan (oblivious to the fact I had only seen a tiny sliver of the Stargate canon between the movie and a few dozen episodes I managed to watch with my father).

Why did I consider myself so attached to it? Because I could see cool people in military clothes and they were part of an organization that sent people through this glowing metal ring. When you think Stargate, there’s a clear image that pops into your head. Even with the spinoff series, you had the same image.

Good settings have an icon that’s broad enough to serve as a focus for a universe but clear enough to be a subject for a movie, game, or novel in its own right. Every conflict in Star Wars brings good and evil into conflict, the Defenders live in the Avengers’ shadow and they feel the consequences of the major-league heroes’ actions, the inhabitants of Earth have to deal with what they’ve done to the Belters intentionally or not.

I don’t want to ramble too long, so I’m going to cut myself off at three points for this, but another key element of a setting is life.

You need to have life in a setting.

I can tell you how someone in the Expanse goes about their daily lives. They have to deal with the lack of artificial gravity if they’re in a spaceship, or the harshness of a heavy burn, or the fact that Mars and Earth are not perfect analogues and people weren’t made to live on another planet. The show does a wonderful job of showing how many everyday things don’t work the same; you’re going to have to pour stuff differently if you live in a spun-up asteroid.

I’ve watched every single episode of the TV show, read every novel and novella, and even bought the comics on Amazon, despite not being much of a comics guy (and, let’s be frank, ignoring the fact that they’re a mite expensive for what they are). It’s a great setting because it feels like I can live in it.

The World of Darkness pulls this off too. It’s our world, but worse, and while they have some more things to worry about, like vampires who need to get blood and werewolves that haunt the nights, the inhabitants have jobs and stories that I can relate to.

Think about how people live. There needs to be some connection that people can draw between their lives and your world, or else it doesn’t work. Some of the really heavy dystopian stuff is difficult, but I actually like the world of SLA Industries for this: it’s a sort of mad world where reality television and serial killer epidemics are taken to a twisted conclusion, and it works. We can picture people living in fear or hopping down into the sewers to check the pipes and getting eaten by horrifying mutants. We can picture living in a world that’s artificial and pruned and there are people who have and people who don’t have and there’s big forces outside our control that determine who belongs in each camp. We know what it’s like to have people that can do things we only dream of, and be jealous and frightened but also inspired.


All right, I’ve made my points, but I want to do a quick overview of this. I’m going to look at one of my favorite settings, Eclipse Phase (a tabletop roleplaying game by Posthuman Studios).

Eclipse Phase is a world of passion. It’s post-apocalyptic transhuman action set in a world where AIs went crazy and murdered everyone, and players typically take on the role of people hunting down the things that hunted them in the Fall. There’s death and violence but also love and rebirth. Everyone’s living on the edge of extinction, but we’re stronger and more advanced than ever before.

It’s also got some darn good icons. Killbots, exotic aliens, a dead Earth, and, most importantly, the Firewall organization that attempts to gather people from all sorts of backgrounds to stand against them. They have this on the inner cover:

Your mind is software. Program it.

Your body is a shell. Change it.

Death is a disease. Cure it.

Extinction is approaching. Fight it.

Holy crap. That’s a lot of action words, and it’s beautifully terse. Still sends shivers down my spine. Not only do those eight sentences define the whole game’s premise, but it’s also a snapshot of what you’re going to be looking at in the setting. Sure, you might have someone going to meet their favorite celebrity chef, but by the end their story’s going to be tied into those four main tenets.

Where Eclipse Phase fell short for me was having the living world. That’s not for want of trying; there are a half-dozen books that provide a lot of insight about the setting, but you mostly got secret agent stuff and other miscellaneous details, not an image of a life.

Two things really helped me feel like I understood how Eclipse Phase’s people lived. First, I read Altered Carbon, which was one of the inspirations for Eclipse Phase. I don’t know that I’d recommend it: it’s pretty sexually charged and has a lot of foul language, but it has characters who deal with the notion of death and coming back, altering their minds, and changing their bodies. It didn’t really cover the fourth point of Eclipse Phase, but that’s fine.

The second thing that really helped me gain a new appreciation for Eclipse Phase was when they published a book of assorted short stories in the setting: I’d gotten the schtick on how to be a secret agent in space, but it was only seeing into a handful of lives that didn’t belong to the Eclipse Phase of secret agents that I could gain an appreciation for the setting beyond the threats and shiny gadgets.